Folks defining CEP, and now this new term IEP, have been very passionate over the past few years that “Complex Event Processing” means the Processing of “Complex Events” not the “Complex Processing” of Events.
Complex events are defined by the same community as composite events, or events that are composed of two or more “contributing” events.
To be consistent, I think we should follow the same logic and grammar in the discussion of “Intelligent Event Processing”.
It follows that Intelligent should be an adjective describing a noun, Event; and Processing is a verb. It also follows that “Intelligent Event Processing” means the Processing of “Intelligent Events” not the “Intelligent Processing” of Events.
This is precisely the problem that folks are creating a new CEP term, “Intelligent Event Processing” to describe processing capabilitities that are missing from the current suite of self-described CEP software products. What people really mean to describe is the Intelligent Processing of Complex Events. However, based on the same grammer used in defining CEP, they have created the Processing of Intelligent Events.
The use of inconsistent grammar and logic is not good for the CEP community, in my opinion. Just because the current generation of self-described CEP vendors do not rise to the capability required by the vast majority of business event applications, we should not create new terms just to make marketing folks happy.
I think I am in a good position to speak about this, because some of my best friends work for software companies selling self-described CEP software and they have seemingly lost patience because I refuse to support inconsistent illogical positioning and repositioning of the CEP market.
Why is the grammar between the terms “Complex Event Processing” and “Intelligent Event Processing” inconsistent?. Folks can only spin and reposition CEP so much before all the spin, hype, and repositioning begins to catch up with the community.
Dr. David Luckham’s original papers and single book on CEP was clear enough about CEP; and CEP covers the entire space that Opher Etzion would like to reposition as IEP. The Grammar of Complex and Intelligent Events are, at best, misleading and inconsistent.
I think the main problem is that what Opher has been describing is the Intelligent Processing of Complex Events – however, to say this would affirm what I have been evangelizing for over two years.